All articles published since 1988 (over 1500 articles) can be accessed for only U.S.$139.99 with a special discounted personal online subscription to the journal. Please click here.
For purchase of this item, please read the instructions ACCESS TO THE JOURNAL CONTENT
Volume 36: Pages 405-410, 2023
On the distinction between corpuscular and wave processes and the arbitrariness in the basis of special relativity theory
Radzhabov Toir Makhsudovicha)
Research Institute at Tajik National University, Rudaki Ave., 17, 734025, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan
This article is devoted to the criticism of the wave-particle dualism and the provisions of the special theory of relativity (SRT). The fallacy of accepting the extended principle of relativity and identifying particles and waves is shown. The substantiation is given that the own fields of physical objects, which are material substances and spatially connect physical objects with each other, are the medium of propagation of light waves. The causal and visual picture of the propagation of light waves is considered, and the features of the mechanism of their propagation in comparison with other types of waves are described. On the basis of an alternative method for obtaining the relativistic law of velocities addition, the inconsistency of the principle of invariance of the interval adopted in the framework of SRT is shown. The inconsistency of the SRT positions and conclusions regarding the so-called relativistic effects—time dilation, mass increase, length decrease, as well as the energy of relativistic particles is shown. The presence of the clock paradox is shown by a simple example. The conclusion is made about the incorrectness of using mathematical transformations of Lorentz and the four-dimensional continuum in the physical representation.
L'article est consacré à la critique du dualisme onde-particule et aux dispositions de la théorie de la relativité restreinte (TRR). L'erreur d'accepter le principe étendu de la relativité et d'identifier les particules et les ondes est démontrée. La justification est donnée que les propres champs des objets physiques, qui sont des substances matérielles et relient spatialement les objets physiques les uns aux autres, sont le moyen de propagation des ondes lumineuses. L'image causale et visuelle de la propagation des ondes lumineuses est considérée, les caractéristiques du mécanisme de leur propagation par rapport à d'autres types d'ondes sont décrites. Sur la base d'une méthode alternative d'obtention de la loi relativiste d'addition des vitesses, on montre l'incohérence du principe d'invariance de l'intervalle adopté dans le cadre de la TRR. L'incohérence des positions et des conclusions de la TRR concernant les effets dits relativistes - dilatation du temps, augmentation de la masse, diminution de la longueur, ainsi que l'énergie des particules relativistes est montrée. La présence du paradoxe de l'horloge est illustrée par un exemple simple. La conclusion est faite sur l'inexactitude de l'utilisation des transformations mathématiques de Lorentz et du continuum à quatre dimensions dans la représentation physique.
Key words: Corpuscular-Wave Dualism; Luminiferous Ether; Criticism of the Special Relativity Theory; The Clock Paradox.
Received: July 2, 2023; Accepted: September 20, 2023; Published Online: October 186, 2023
a) This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
